Umbilical Cord Blood Retrieval vs Embryonic Stem Cell, Research, which is the better choice? - umbilical cord blood sampling
A nurse told me that I could save four times the quantity of available cord blood cells (normally released after birth) compared to research on stem cells. Say what? Why in the world that we are all at the expense of permanent confrontation, and stem cells, if this is the case? Someone has a valid comparison?
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
Umbilical Cord Blood Sampling Umbilical Cord Blood Retrieval Vs Embryonic Stem Cell, Research, Which Is The Better Choice?
9 comments:
Stem cells from umbilical cord blood are the only stem cells called multipotent adult stem cells. You can use a handful of different things, how they are used (for example, bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, rather than have a bone marrow transplant bone marrow, they have the same kind of stem cells) from bone marrow.
Embryonic stem cells are pluripotent, meaning they can be many different types of stem cells, leaving open the use of different things.
Recent research on adult stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood and its uses have become, but still well below potential use of embryonic stem cells.
In addition to continuing the fight is not research on embryonic stem cells, as only he can do. Procedures are in place the legal and socially acceptable production more dead embryos and unusable. Why should these embryos, as much as we can learn. If the research on stem cells, then they should be used for other research purposes. Even if you never another booster remains of IVF embryos AGAin, embryos still in the process is legally and socially acceptable. I do not understand why his property to help the dead embryos, if the result of infertility testing pregnant poor women to become, but he's wrong if these dead embryos can millions of people to live more productive lives?
Why continue to support research on stem cells, you ask? Because nobody has a problem with other methods and research that lead to dead embryos. During her dead embryos for use in research, I will be used to fight for them. I believe that everything that can be used, must be used, and my body be donated for research after death, and I have my body for life for research. I fully support research and thinking on adult cells, but not to have his handful of development over 100 years sufficient to stem cell research after a 10th
Stem cells from umbilical cord blood are the only stem cells called multipotent adult stem cells. You can use a handful of different things, how they are used (for example, bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, rather than have a bone marrow transplant bone marrow, they have the same kind of stem cells) from bone marrow.
Embryonic stem cells are pluripotent, meaning they can be many different types of stem cells, leaving open the use of different things.
Recent research on adult stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood and its uses have become, but still well below potential use of embryonic stem cells.
In addition to continuing the fight is not research on embryonic stem cells, as only he can do. Procedures are in place the legal and socially acceptable production more dead embryos and unusable. Why should these embryos, as much as we can learn. If the research on stem cells, then they should be used for other research purposes. Even if you never another booster remains of IVF embryos AGAin, embryos still in the process is legally and socially acceptable. I do not understand why his property to help the dead embryos, if the result of infertility testing pregnant poor women to become, but he's wrong if these dead embryos can millions of people to live more productive lives?
Why continue to support research on stem cells, you ask? Because nobody has a problem with other methods and research that lead to dead embryos. During her dead embryos for use in research, I will be used to fight for them. I believe that everything that can be used, must be used, and my body be donated for research after death, and I have my body for life for research. I fully support research and thinking on adult cells, but not to have his handful of development over 100 years sufficient to stem cell research after a 10th
OK, so I think u noe that stem cells are cells that have specialized (liver cells, heart muscle cells, us). But it's just a jump from a mother cell to cell, a heart. There are steps. Stem cells from umbilical cord blood into cells (white blood cells, red blood cells, T cells, etc..) Can you work on a way, the process of stem cells that can reverse such a thing but until then, stem cells of umbilical cord actually useful for leukemia and blood transfusion. We spend so much money, if we can build organs and nerves.
OK, so I think u noe that stem cells are cells that have specialized (liver cells, heart muscle cells, us). But it's just a jump from a mother cell to cell, a heart. There are steps. Stem cells from umbilical cord blood into cells (white blood cells, red blood cells, T cells, etc..) Can you work on a way, the process of stem cells that can reverse such a thing but until then, stem cells of umbilical cord actually useful for leukemia and blood transfusion. We spend so much money, if we can build organs and nerves.
Not a medical research and have no idea, either a nurse. "
I hope the owners and PhD research and not hearsay.
Why is this a problem? It defines the noise as a topic of conversation in order to draw on?
EDIT: I stand by my reply that the decision should be left to the medical-doctoral research. And fixing the noise is not important for the issues that divide us into nonsense.
Not a medical research and have no idea, either a nurse. "
I hope the owners and PhD research and not hearsay.
Why is this a problem? It defines the noise as a topic of conversation in order to draw on?
EDIT: I stand by my reply that the decision should be left to the medical-doctoral research. And fixing the noise is not important for the issues that divide us into nonsense.
Not a medical research and have no idea, either a nurse. "
I hope the owners and PhD research and not hearsay.
Why is this a problem? It defines the noise as a topic of conversation in order to draw on?
EDIT: I stand by my reply that the decision should be left to the medical-doctoral research. And fixing the noise is not important for the issues that divide us into nonsense.
Not a medical research and have no idea, either a nurse. "
I hope the owners and PhD research and not hearsay.
Why is this a problem? It defines the noise as a topic of conversation in order to draw on?
EDIT: I stand by my reply that the decision should be left to the medical-doctoral research. And fixing the noise is not important for the issues that divide us into nonsense.
The "everything lol baby" culture of embryonic stem cell researchers from whips truly insane.
Post a Comment